Engineering

  • Engineering
    • Projects
    • Mechanical
    • CFD & Surge Analysis
    • Pulsations & Vibrations
    • Fiberglass Engineering
    • Geothermal Wells
  • Software
    • BOSfluids
    • BOSpulse
    • FEPipe
    • NozzlePRO
    • FEATools
    • Jive
    • ISOtracer
    • BOSview
    • BOS B31
  • Training
  • Career
  • News
  • Contact
Skip to content

Engineering

Dynaflow Research Group
  • Engineering
    • Projects
    • Mechanical
    • CFD & Surge Analysis
    • Pulsations & Vibrations
    • Fiberglass Engineering
    • Geothermal Wells
  • Software
    • Flow Analysis
      • BOSfluids
      • BOSpulse
    • Structural Analysis
      • FEPipe
      • NozzlePRO
      • FEATools
    • Academic
      • Jive
    • Tools
      • ISOtracer
      • BOSview
      • BOS B31
  • Training
  • Career
  • News
  • contact

Pressure Vessels

Are you looking for a partner for FEA of your vessel

Most pressure vessels will be designed using Design by Formula (DBF) according to ASME VIII Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code or EN 13445. However, not all loads and geometries can be considered with these standard design rules. For example think of cyclic thermal loading, where the metal temperature distribution needs to be calculated, or the design of a nozzle with gussets or a nozzle close to a discontinuity in the shell geometry.

At DRG we regularly perform Finite Element Analyses (FEA) and assessments according to ASME VIII-2 Part 5 or EN 13445-3. For these analyses we use the software packages ANSYS, CREO simulate and FEPipe. Our knowledge in these areas also feeds through to our training courses in FEA software and pressure vessel design codes.

Cyclic load assessment

The most common use of FEA for pressure vessel design is for a cyclic loading assessment. Such an analysis is required if the vessel does not conform to the fatigue screening criteria in ASME VIII-2 Part 5.5 or EN 13445-3 5.4. Cyclic loading can lead to the accumulation of micro strain, crack initiation and crack growth. A crack will typically reach macroscopic dimensions and cause failure after a high number of cycles (typically in the order of thousands, but there is no fixed limit).

On the other hand there is cyclic failure due to a limited number of cycles. This type of failure results from crack growth due to the build up of plastic strain (ratcheting).

Non–standard geometry

Not all geometries are covered by a standard design rule, think of the closure of a hairpin heat exchanger or a rectangular flange connection. One option is to expand the DBF approach to cover these geometries in a conservative manner. However, this most likely results in more material usage and the requirement to justify to the client or notified body why the method is conservative. Using FEA can be useful here, providing the possibility to optimize and a straightforward way to demonstrate code conformance.

Non-linear analyses

When analyzing components under high tempe­ratures and stresses, the understanding of possi­ble creep deformations is of crucial importance. Creep is the tendency of a solid material to move slowly or deform permanently under the influ­ence of stresses well below the yield strength. It is a time-dependent deformation which does not occur suddenly under the application of stress. Rather, it is the accumulation of strain as a result of long-term stresses.

When a component deforms plastically, the stress in the component is redistributed. This behavior is not captured with a linear elastic material model. For some geometries the results of the stress assessment may be more optimistic when a plastic material model is used.

Steps in an FEA assessment

Step 1: Thermal loading

What is the temperature distribution within the vessel? Do significant local thermal gradients occur or are there large differences between components? Determining the (transient) heat transfer boundary conditions, and thereby the actual temperature distribution is a key part of most FEA analyses. Here we take care to ensure a conservative but credible case, which is either based on flow calculations with CFD, analytical formulas or HTRI results.

Step 2: Calculate the stresses

The calculated temperature distribution is used as a boundary condition in the FEA model, together with the other loadings such as pressure and nozzle loads. With an elastic material model the calculated stresses need to be categorized, it needs to be considered which load is primary (or weight driven) or secondary (displacement limited). It is important to consider which loads should be combined, for instance what is the range for the startup/shut down, or the operating cycle, or does the pressure load always act simultaneously with the thermal loading.

Step 3: Results and recommendations for the client

The results from a DRG analysis will always be documented in a detailed technical report. This will include all of the boundary conditions, details of the model setup and the analysis approach, and will be suitable for a rigorous review by a notified body.  The report will also make sure that the results are explained to the client in a concise manner to build up to conclusions and practical recommendations.

Latest engineering news

16 July 2021

Corrosion Resistant Alternative for Geothermal Well Casings

READ INFO
14 May 2021

Dynaflow to join Industry Insights with Hexagon PPM and Stressman Engineering

READ INFO
13 April 2021

Webinar series: Power Your Dynamic Stress Analysis with BOSfluids and CAESAR II

READ INFO
4 February 2021

Screw compressor silencer performance check

READ INFO
10 December 2020

Fiberglass piping design and installation for a petrochemical plant

READ INFO
4 December 2020

VentiScan gaat samenwerking aan met R-Vent Group

READ INFO
19 November 2020

Transport of aerosols (COVID-19) in classrooms – Ventilation comparison

READ INFO
6 October 2020

Start of New Research Project GRE GEO

READ INFO
14 September 2020

European Geothermica project “Glass Fiber Reinforced Epoxy Casing Systems for Geothermal Application” awarded

READ INFO
25 August 2020

Dynaflow Research Group launches VentiScan

READ INFO
21 April 2020

Remaining life assessment using API 579

READ INFO
14 April 2020

Dynaflow Online Training Courses – temporary 50% discount

READ INFO
View all
  • Dynaflow Dynaflow Research Group is ISO:9001 certified.
    ISO 9001:2015
    certified
  • HEAD OFFICE

    Laan van Oversteen 20
    6th floor
    2289 CX Rijswijk
    The Netherlands

  • MIDDLE EAST OFFICE

    Bay X2 Tower, Unit 3109
    Jumeirah Lakes Towers, cluster X
    P.O. Box 73001, Dubai
    United Arab Emirates

  • CONTACT

    Phone: +31 (0)85 058 0046
    E-mail: infoaanvraag@dynaflow.com

  • © Dynaflow Research Group BV

    • Terms & Conditions
    • Privacy policy
    • Cookie policy (EU)
    • About us
    • Contact